On the surface, President Trump’s announcement of a new trade agreement with Vietnam appears to be a strategic victory for American interests. The claim that the U.S. will gain tariff-free access to Vietnamese markets and impose a 20% tariff on imports is presented as a win, a step towards fairer competition and economic sovereignty. Yet,
Politics
The recent passage of President Trump’s sweeping domestic policy bill in the Senate reveals more about political theater than genuine legislative progress. The narrow 51-50 vote, facilitated by Vice President Vance’s decisive tie-breaker, illustrates how precariously bipartisan this agreement truly is. Notably, some prominent Republican senators, traditionally aligned with the party’s fiscal conservatism, broke ranks—voting
Canada’s recent retraction of its digital services tax, just hours before the first payments were due, reveals more about the precarious nature of economic diplomacy with its southern neighbor than about the merits of the tax itself. Imposed initially to stretch Canada’s taxation sovereignty over global tech giants earning billions within its borders, the 3%
The recent procedural win for President Donald Trump’s sprawling spending bill signals more than just legislative progress; it exposes a fractured Republican Party struggling with its identity and priorities. Passing the motion to proceed with a razor-thin 51-49 margin after hours of delay and back-and-forth underscores the fragility of what some Republicans market as a
Thailand is currently caught in a political maelstrom that feels both alarmingly familiar yet ominously intensified. Hundreds of protesters have converged on Bangkok’s Victory Monument, demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra. This eruption of discontent is not a spontaneous outburst—it’s a calculated show of force by nationalist groups long opposed to the Shinawatra
Donald Trump’s recent denunciation of Zohran Mamdani, labeling him a “communist” and predicting that New York City will turn into a “communistic city” if Mamdani is elected mayor, is as politically reactionary as it is intellectually lazy. This episode highlights the persistent use of incendiary language to marginalize progressive voices in American politics rather than
The mercurial nature of President Donald Trump’s trade policies has become a hallmark of his administration. Recent statements from White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt indicate a willingness to extend deadlines for tariff negotiations, transforming a seemingly definitive schedule into an almost whimsical affair. When asked if Trump remains committed to the pressing deadline for
President Donald Trump’s unwavering assertion that U.S. military actions have obliterated Iran’s nuclear capabilities is, at best, misleading. In a recent press conference, he confidently declared that the nuclear facility at Fordo had been “totally obliterated.” Simultaneously, the reality is that preliminary intelligence assessments tell a different story. They assert that, while U.S. airstrikes may
In an era where surveillance and military engagement have become synonymous with national security, the debate surrounding the War Powers Act has ignited fierce contention. Recently, House Speaker Mike Johnson’s bold assertion that the War Powers Act is unconstitutional raises urgent questions about the separation of powers and the limits of presidential authority. Johnson’s remarks
In a dramatic exhibition of political rhetoric, former President Donald Trump took to Truth Social to assert that the U.S. military strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities resulted in “obliteration.” This incendiary claim, laden with bravado, feeds into a narrative that glorifies military action but lacks concrete substantiation. While Trump insisted that significant damage had been